SarahChen_PharmD said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Dr.PathRoch said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Carry on.