raj_cambridge said:The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
raj_cambridge said:The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after raj_cambridge’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
lisa_labSD said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.