Dr.PeteFamMed said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
Dr.PeteFamMed said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
Dr.PeteFamMed said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from Dr.PeteFamMed — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
NicoleRaleigh said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I read this differently from NicoleRaleigh, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.