Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Following on from sarah_TO — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
PeptideSynthNJ said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
Coming at PeptideSynthNJ’s question from a different direction. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsReporting back.
Closing the loop. The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.
Dr.SleepRoch said:Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.