Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Following on from BariatricNurseD — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
PeptideSynthNJ said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Coming at PeptideSynthNJ’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsReporting back.
Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction. Correcting it here rather than editing it away.
CarlaRPh_TPA said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.