The fatigue arrived at about week six and has not shifted since, and I cannot tell whether it is the drug, the deficit or something I should have tested by now.
What would genuinely help is knowing whether the fatigue is a direct drug effect or simply the caloric deficit, because the answer changes what you do about it.
Happy to be told the question itself is wrong.
Short answer first, then the reasoning. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
mike.trainer_LA said:Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the…
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsRegAffairsDC said:The fatigue arrived at about week six and has not shifted since, and I cannot tell whether it is the drug, the deficit or something I should have…
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.