LipidDoc_ATL said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
LipidDoc_ATL said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
LipidDoc_ATL said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from LipidDoc_ATL — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
BethLabQueen said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.