🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesMy dad had a heart attack and now I am terrified - will GLP-1 help? — looking for input

My dad had a heart attack and now I am terrified - will GLP-1 help? — looking for input

PharmHunterJen Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 12:34 AM 37 replies 2,232 viewsPage 1 of 8
This thread is more than 11 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
Jul 3, 2025 at 12:34 AM#1

This gets cited here weekly, usually second-hand, so it is worth setting out what it does and does not establish.

SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in people with established cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, without diabetes. The effect appeared earlier than the weight-loss curve can comfortably explain, which is the basis for arguing that some of the benefit is direct — anti-inflammatory and vascular — rather than purely a consequence of weight.

Where I think it is weakest: the completion rate deserves as much attention as the headline, because a large effect among those who finished is a different claim from a large effect among those enrolled.

The bit I cannot resolve on my own is how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical. I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
7 10Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Jul 3, 2025 at 12:51 AM#2
PharmHunterJen said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

From SELECT trial: MACE at 39 months — 6.5% semaglutide vs 8.0% placebo. ARR = 1.5%. NNT = 67 over 3.3 years.

Compare to established therapies:

InterventionNNTTimeframe
Semaglutide (MACE)673.3 years
Statins primary prevention (MI)~1005 years
Aspirin secondary prevention~772 years

These NNTs are clinically meaningful and comparable to accepted cardiovascular interventions.

Last edited: Jul 3, 2025 at 3:51 AM
8 11NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver, TinaHashiRN and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_manc_UK
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Manchester, UK
Jul 3, 2025 at 1:08 AM#3
PharmHunterJen said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

I read this differently from PharmHunterJen, on substance rather than tone. The "earlier than weight loss explains" argument is weaker than this thread makes it sound. Blood pressure and inflammatory markers move fast and are downstream of early weight loss, so the mechanism is not as cleanly separable as the summaries imply.

9 12FitDadDave, RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
LindaRN_retired
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Sarasota, FL
Jul 3, 2025 at 1:25 AM#4
pete_manc_UK said:
The "earlier than weight loss explains" argument is weaker than this thread makes it sound.

Vitamin deficiency cascade with cardiovascular risk: after 6+ months of reduced food intake, I developed a subtle but important pattern: low B12 → elevated homocysteine → increased cardiovascular risk marker.

The connection: B12 is a cofactor for homocysteine metabolism. Without adequate B12, homocysteine accumulates. This is ironic — taking a CV-protective medication while developing a CV risk factor from reduced nutrition.

Solution: comprehensive vitamin supplementation and regular lab monitoring. Don't let the medication's benefits be undermined by nutritional deficiencies.

10 13LondonLisa, mike_nyc, VendorMark and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
steph_laguna
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Laguna Beach, CA
Jul 3, 2025 at 2:56 AM#5
SarahChen_PharmD said:
NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.

11 14marco_milano, pam_columbus, nick_SD_fit and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1238

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register