🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesMy blood pressure normalization journey — July 2024

My blood pressure normalization journey — July 2024

JessicaH_TX Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 1:11 PM 25 replies 1,700 viewsPage 1 of 5
This thread is more than 9 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
JessicaH_TX
Senior Member
4,123
13,456
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Aug 16, 2025 at 1:11 PM#1

My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

The narrow version of the question is how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

Practical detail welcome, however dull — the duller the better.

5 8wendy_avl, jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Aug 16, 2025 at 2:03 PM#2
JessicaH_TX said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

Cardiac biomarkers and cardiovascular risk: my cardiologist ordered advanced cardiac labs given my family history. Results were encouraging:

  • NT-proBNP: 48 pg/mL (normal, cardiac function preserved)
  • Lp(a): 28 nmol/L (genetic, unchanged — expected)
  • ApoB: dropped from 148 to 88 mg/dL (excellent response)
  • Coronary calcium score: 0 (unchanged from baseline — reassuring)

The ApoB reduction is particularly meaningful — it's considered the best single predictor of cardiovascular risk. GLP-1 therapy seems to improve this consistently.

6 9PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SleepRoch
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Rochester, MN
Aug 16, 2025 at 2:55 PM#3
LibrarianMeg said:
Cardiac biomarkers and cardiovascular risk: my cardiologist ordered advanced cardiac labs given my family history.

Mendelian randomization evidence supporting GLP-1 pathway modulation for cardiovascular risk: genetic variants in the GLP1R gene region associated with lower BMI also show associations with reduced cardiovascular risk, confirming a causal pathway[1].

This "natural experiment" (people born with genetically higher GLP-1 signaling being leaner and healthier) provides orthogonal evidence supporting the pharmacological approach. When genetic epidemiology, clinical trials, and mechanistic studies all converge, confidence in the therapeutic approach is high.

References:
[1] Zheng SL, et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(12):869-879.
7 10Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
rachel_ABQ
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Albuquerque, NM
Aug 16, 2025 at 3:47 PM#4
JessicaH_TX said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

Last edited: Aug 16, 2025 at 8:47 PM
8 11SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
Aug 16, 2025 at 8:44 PM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Vitamin deficiency cascade with cardiovascular risk: after 6+ months of reduced food intake, I developed a subtle but important pattern: low B12 → elevated homocysteine → increased cardiovascular risk marker.

The connection: B12 is a cofactor for homocysteine metabolism. Without adequate B12, homocysteine accumulates. This is ironic — taking a CV-protective medication while developing a CV risk factor from reduced nutrition.

Solution: comprehensive vitamin supplementation and regular lab monitoring. Don't let the medication's benefits be undermined by nutritional deficiencies.

9 12claudia_zurich, nancy_portland, rick_sfbay and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1235

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register