🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareHair loss on GLP-1 agonists: telogen effluvium vs nutritional deficiency — my results so far Page 6

Hair loss on GLP-1 agonists: telogen effluvium vs nutritional deficiency — my results so far

adam_van Thu, May 30, 2024 at 9:12 AM 40 replies 2,136 viewsPage 6 of 8
BariatricNurseD
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Dallas, TX
Online
Jun 13, 2024 at 12:06 AM#26
JenPlateau said:
It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

35 10tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Jun 14, 2024 at 4:33 AM#27

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

34 9stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
HealthEcon_DC
Member
567
3,456
Apr 2024
Washington, DC
Jun 15, 2024 at 9:01 AM#28

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

Last edited: Jun 15, 2024 at 11:01 AM
33 8KevinCompounds, TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
NauseaFreeNow
Member
345
1,234
Aug 2024
Indiana
Jun 16, 2024 at 1:30 PM#29
TrialTracker_MD said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

Last edited: Jun 16, 2024 at 5:30 PM
32 7lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
adam_van
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Vancouver, CA
Jun 17, 2024 at 5:59 PM#30

Closing the loop on my own question.

Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction. Correcting it here rather than editing it away.

10 10hyun_seoul, jim_asheville, matt_MKE and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register