Hair loss on GLP-1 agonists: telogen effluvium vs nutritional deficiency — my results so far

Dr.NateNeph said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

Dr.NateNeph said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.

Dr.NateNeph said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

JenPlateau said:

It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.