🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesSELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — looking for input Page 5

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — looking for input

TinaHashiRN Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 9:06 AM 29 replies 1,384 viewsPage 5 of 6
LarryQC_SD
Senior Member
2,123
9,876
Jan 2024
San Diego, CA
Jan 5, 2026 at 5:02 PM#21

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

Last edited: Jan 5, 2026 at 6:02 PM
37 12NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver, TinaHashiRN and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SportsMedIN
Senior Member
1,456
6,789
Feb 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Jan 5, 2026 at 11:19 PM#22
mel_PDX said:
The gap between trial results and real-world results is consistent and it is not fraud.

NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

From SELECT trial: MACE at 39 months — 6.5% semaglutide vs 8.0% placebo. ARR = 1.5%. NNT = 67 over 3.3 years.

Compare to established therapies:

InterventionNNTTimeframe
Semaglutide (MACE)673.3 years
Statins primary prevention (MI)~1005 years
Aspirin secondary prevention~772 years

These NNTs are clinically meaningful and comparable to accepted cardiovascular interventions.

36 11lisa_labSD, adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
nick_SD_fit
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
San Diego, CA
Jan 6, 2026 at 5:37 AM#23
mel_PDX said:
The gap between trial results and real-world results is consistent and it is not fraud.

Vitamin deficiency cascade with cardiovascular risk: after 6+ months of reduced food intake, I developed a subtle but important pattern: low B12 → elevated homocysteine → increased cardiovascular risk marker.

The connection: B12 is a cofactor for homocysteine metabolism. Without adequate B12, homocysteine accumulates. This is ironic — taking a CV-protective medication while developing a CV risk factor from reduced nutrition.

Solution: comprehensive vitamin supplementation and regular lab monitoring. Don't let the medication's benefits be undermined by nutritional deficiencies.

Last edited: Jan 6, 2026 at 7:37 AM
35 10EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
BariatricNurseD
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Dallas, TX
Online
Jan 6, 2026 at 11:55 AM#24
mel_PDX said:
The gap between trial results and real-world results is consistent and it is not fraud.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.

Last edited: Jan 6, 2026 at 4:55 PM
34 9tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore, roxy_nash and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.EM_Chicago
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Chicago, IL
Jan 6, 2026 at 6:13 PM#25

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 65 years old and started this journey skeptically. My geriatrician recommended it after years of failed interventions.

9 months later: down 53 lbs, more mobile, pain reduced, medications simplified. My quality of life has improved dramatically. I wish this existed 20 years ago.

To other older adults hesitating: the SELECT trial proved benefit in our age group. You deserve to feel good in your body regardless of age.

Last edited: Jan 6, 2026 at 10:13 PM
33 8lisa_labSD, adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register