pete_nash said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
pete_nash said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
Coming at pete_nash’s question from a different direction. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
One concrete data point for the thread. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from pete_nash — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
PharmacoVig_BOS said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.