Jun 8, 2026 at 8:27 AM#16
GenomicsKate said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Second this.
28 3mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 8, 2026 at 11:19 AM#17
PharmacoVig_BOS said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
27 2Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor, JenMemphis and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 8, 2026 at 2:10 PM#18
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Worth separating that from liver and MASH, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.
26 1hans_munich, jason_sac26, chris_chi24 and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsJun 8, 2026 at 5:02 PM#19
julia.endo said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
25 0PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report