🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesHas anyone dealt with heart failure hospitalization reduction on semaglutide?

Has anyone dealt with heart failure hospitalization reduction on semaglutide?

KetoKyle Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 9:52 AM 30 replies 1,463 viewsPage 1 of 6
KetoKyle
Member
678
3,456
Jul 2024
Utah
Feb 24, 2026 at 9:52 AM#1

Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

Relative versus absolute is the distinction that gets lost: a 20% relative reduction on a high baseline risk is a large absolute benefit, and the same relative figure on a low baseline risk is a small one.

What would genuinely help is knowing how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

Practical detail welcome, however dull — the duller the better.

36 14laura_annarbor, JenMemphis, pat_auckland and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
Feb 24, 2026 at 11:43 AM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. Steady state is the thing most people miss. The terminal half-life is about a week, so every dose step takes four to five weeks to fully express itself. Judging a step at day ten is judging the ascent, not the plateau, and it is the single commonest reason people escalate before they needed to.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

37 15KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pat_auckland
Member
345
1,567
Jun 2024
Auckland, NZ
Feb 24, 2026 at 1:34 PM#3
VendorMark said:
Steady state is the thing most people miss.

Agreed, though "tolerable" needs defining. A dose you tolerate by eating almost nothing is not tolerated, it is being paid for somewhere else — usually in lean mass, sometimes in adherence three months later.

38 16LarryQC_SD, wanda_boise, NurseAsh_DET and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
paige_pharma
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Omaha, NE
Feb 24, 2026 at 3:25 PM#4
KetoKyle said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

That holds for the injectable. The oral formulation has different absorption behaviour and the dose numbers are not interchangeable, which is worth saying out loud because people quote them as if they were.

39 17lisa_labSD, adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Feb 25, 2026 at 2:19 AM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
40 18LabKate, kate.chem, DataDave and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1236

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register