Mar 10, 2024 at 12:16 AM#16
roxy_nash said:TrialTracker_MD said: ...regarding the trial evidence...
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.
2 0wanda_boise, NurseAsh_DET
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 11, 2024 at 11:24 PM#17
DoseLogDan said:Forest plot interpretation for the the trial evidence meta-analysis: when reading the pooled estimate, pay attention to: Point estimate (HR/RR/OR) —…
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
Last edited: Mar 12, 2024 at 4:24 AM
3 1lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 13, 2024 at 10:31 PM#18
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
Happy to go further on any of that.
4 2Dr.ReproEndo, lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMar 15, 2024 at 9:37 PM#19
Dr.EM_Chicago said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Last edited: Mar 15, 2024 at 11:37 PM
5 3JenPlateau, SallyK_inj, CryptoCarl and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 17, 2024 at 8:42 PM#20
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.
Last edited: Mar 18, 2024 at 12:42 AM
27 0PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report