🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesCoronary artery calcium score changes on GLP-1 — 2-year follow-up Page 2

Coronary artery calcium score changes on GLP-1 — 2-year follow-up

Dr.RaviCardio Thu, May 28, 2026 at 5:26 PM 14 replies 356 viewsPage 2 of 3
lucas_SP_BR
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
São Paulo, BR
May 28, 2026 at 7:14 PM#6
Dr.RaviCardio said:
SELECT is the trial that changed the framing of this class, because it was an outcome trial rather than a weight trial: about a 20% relative reduction…

6 month update on cardiovascular risk: down 40 lbs, off blood pressure meds, A1C normalized. Genuinely life-changing.

Last edited: May 28, 2026 at 9:14 PM
34 4NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver, TinaHashiRN and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeNYC_runner
Member
378
1,678
Jul 2024
New York, NY
May 28, 2026 at 7:56 PM#7

One thing that is still open after chris_chi24’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

33 3HealthEcon_DC, PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
May 28, 2026 at 8:38 PM#8
lucas_SP_BR said:
6 month update on cardiovascular risk: down 40 lbs, off blood pressure meds, A1C normalized.
lucas_SP_BR said:
...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

I understand the skepticism — we've all seen "miracle" weight loss solutions come and go. But consider what makes GLP-1 agonists different:

  • Phase 3 RCTs with thousands of participants (not 20-person pilot studies)
  • Published in NEJM, JAMA, Lancet (not press releases)
  • Replicated across multiple independent research groups
  • Proven cardiovascular and renal benefits beyond weight loss
  • Biological mechanism fully characterized at the receptor level

This isn't a fad — it's a new drug class supported by the highest level of clinical evidence. The comparison to past fads is understandable but inappropriate.

32 2HealthEcon_DC, PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.RaviCardio
VIP Member
2,890
15,678
Jan 2024
New York, NY
May 28, 2026 at 9:20 PM#9
lucas_SP_BR said:
6 month update on cardiovascular risk: down 40 lbs, off blood pressure meds, A1C normalized.

I want to bring up the cardiovascular angle on cardiovascular risk.

The SELECT trial demonstrated a 20% reduction in MACE with semaglutide 2.4mg[1]. This is practice-changing because the CV benefit appears to be independent of the degree of weight loss — suggesting direct vascular and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

For cardiovascular risk, this means we need to think beyond the primary outcome and consider the cardiovascular implications. The all-cause mortality reduction (HR 0.81) is the most clinically meaningful signal.

References:
[1] Lincoff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221-2232.
31 1hans_munich, jason_sac26, chris_chi24 and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
May 29, 2026 at 12:40 AM#10
Dr.MetabolicMD said:
lucas_SP_BR said: ...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

NNT calculation for cardiovascular risk clinical endpoints: NNT = 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction).

From SELECT trial: MACE at 39 months — 6.5% semaglutide vs 8.0% placebo. ARR = 1.5%. NNT = 67 over 3.3 years.

Compare to established therapies:

InterventionNNTTimeframe
Semaglutide (MACE)673.3 years
Statins primary prevention (MI)~1005 years
Aspirin secondary prevention~772 years

These NNTs are clinically meaningful and comparable to accepted cardiovascular interventions.

Last edited: May 29, 2026 at 2:40 AM
31 6pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo, JakeBK_lifts and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register