🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOral GLP-1 AgonistsOral sema absorption enhancer SNAC — anyone have experience? Page 4

Oral sema absorption enhancer SNAC — anyone have experience?

dave_SLC Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:27 PM 55 replies 2,928 viewsPage 4 of 11
sarah_TO
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Toronto, CA
Apr 14, 2024 at 8:54 AM#16

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

26 1andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP, GraceAZ_72 and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lisa_labSD
Member
278
1,234
Oct 2024
San Diego, CA
Apr 15, 2024 at 12:27 AM#17

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

25 0maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LindaRN_retired
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Sarasota, FL
Apr 15, 2024 at 4:00 PM#18

One thing that is still open after PeptideChemSF’s answer:

How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?

24 24amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa, mike_nyc and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.DermMIA
Member
456
2,123
May 2024
Miami, FL
Apr 16, 2024 at 7:33 AM#19
lisa_labSD said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

I read this differently from lisa_labSD, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

23 23PeptideChemSF, A1cHero_PHX, Dr.RenalNash and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Apr 16, 2024 at 11:07 PM#20

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

Last edited: Apr 17, 2024 at 3:07 AM
1 1PeptideSynthNJ
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Orforglipron Phase 3 ATTAIN-1 topline — oral non-peptide GLP-116 replies
Oral semaglutide 50mg (Rybelsus HD) — OASIS program results12 replies
Danuglipron BID dosing — Pfizer oral GLP-1 update7 replies
Oral vs injectable GLP-1: bioavailability and efficacy comparison5 replies
Orforglipron food interaction profile — no fasting requirement15 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register