I stopped wanting wine and I was NOT prepared for that — 6 month update

LabKate said:

The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.

LabKate said:

The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.

Coming at LabKate’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

One thing that is still open after LabKate’s answer:

How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?

FDA_TrackerJim said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.