lisa_labSD said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
No disagreement with lisa_labSD. One condition attached. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
lisa_labSD said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
That reframing is the part I needed.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemjames_edin said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
james_edin said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Happy to go further on any of that.