Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Apr 7, 2025 at 10:56 AM#61
22 20SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 16, 2025 at 9:16 PM#62
One thing that is still open after SleepDoc_PDX’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
23 21AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 26, 2025 at 7:31 AM#63
raj_cambridge said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Last edited: Apr 26, 2025 at 10:31 AM
24 22MaxMetOK, MounjBrad, nick_newbie and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsMay 5, 2025 at 5:41 PM#64
Closing the loop on my own question.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
25 23BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
May 15, 2025 at 3:45 AM#65
raj_cambridge said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
26 24jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report