wendy_avl said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
This was answered several pages up and is worth repeating rather than re-litigating:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Reporting back.
Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction. Correcting it here rather than editing it away.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdmin said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
Admin said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Coming back to something from earlier in the thread, because it keeps being talked past:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.