Has anyone dealt with oral glp-1 adherence?

LindaRN_retired said:

Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

DataDave said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

DataDave said:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.