One thing that is still open after Dr.RenalNash’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
One thing that is still open after Dr.RenalNash’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Pushing back on lucas_SP_BR here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardslucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.