LarryQC_SD said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
LarryQC_SD said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Coming at LarryQC_SD’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after LarryQC_SD’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Dr.PulmRoch said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.