EndoResFellow said:My labs after 6 months on glycaemic control: A1C 6.0%, fasting glucose 80 mg/dL, fasting insulin 5 uIU/mL.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Taking it to my next appointment.
EndoResFellow said:My labs after 6 months on glycaemic control: A1C 6.0%, fasting glucose 80 mg/dL, fasting insulin 5 uIU/mL.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Taking it to my next appointment.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Dr.PainCLE said:Glycemic variability as the key metric for glycaemic control success: my coefficient of variation (CV) on CGM dropped from 42% to 18%.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.