DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
paige_pharma said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Second this.