🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPharmacology & MechanismsGLP-1/GIP receptor co-agonism — September 2026 Page 2

GLP-1/GIP receptor co-agonism — September 2026

AussieAnna Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:51 PM 11 replies 1,876 viewsPage 2 of 3
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Aug 30, 2024 at 10:01 AM#6
Dr.ReproEndo said:
The GIP arm is doing real work rather than padding the label.

Pushing back on Dr.ReproEndo here. The "tirzepatide is simply better" summary irritates me. It is better on mean weight loss, and the cardiovascular outcome evidence is far thinner than semaglutide's. If the reason for treating is cardiovascular risk rather than weight, the evidence base points the other way.

Last edited: Aug 30, 2024 at 3:01 PM
9 4mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Aug 30, 2024 at 2:02 PM#7

One concrete data point for the thread. Numbers worth memorising for this class: Tmax one to three days for the weekly peptides, terminal half-life about a week for semaglutide and about five days for tirzepatide, steady state at four to five half-lives, subcutaneous bioavailability high enough that site choice is irrelevant.

Worth separating that from the pharmacology, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

8 3dave_SLC, FDA_TrackerJim, ricardo_MIA and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
claudia_zurich
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Zurich, CH
Aug 30, 2024 at 6:03 PM#8
Dr.GastroMayo said:
The "tirzepatide is simply better" summary irritates me.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The mechanism is more central than most summaries suggest. Receptor agonism in the arcuate nucleus activates POMC neurons and inhibits AgRP/NPY signalling, and the downstream MC4R pathway is the same one disrupted in monogenic obesity — convergent genetic evidence that the target is the right one. Peripherally there is glucose-dependent insulin secretion, glucagon suppression and delayed gastric emptying, but the gastric component largely adapts over months while the central effect persists, which is why the durable effect is appetite rather than fullness.

Worth separating that from the pharmacology, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

7 2Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
tampaLisa73
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Tampa, FL
Aug 30, 2024 at 10:04 PM#9

One thing that is still open after dave_SLC’s answer:

How much of the tirzepatide advantage is the GIP component and how much is simply that the dose ladder goes higher in receptor-occupancy terms?

6 1mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92, FitDadDave and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
AussieAnna
Member
678
2,890
Jun 2024
Sydney, AU
Aug 31, 2024 at 5:20 PM#10

Reporting back.

Reporting back after another eight months at the same dose. Still losing slowly, no new side effects, and no reason I can find to climb further.

Last edited: Aug 31, 2024 at 6:20 PM
38 11pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

GLP-1R desensitization — β-arrestin-mediated internalization18 replies
Biased agonism at GLP-1R — Gs vs β-arrestin signaling balance13 replies
Semaglutide albumin binding and the C-18 fatty acid linker17 replies
GIP receptor pharmacology — why GIP agonism enhances GLP-113 replies
Glucagon receptor signaling — hepatic glycogenolysis and lipolysis16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register