Following on from LibrarianMeg — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
anders_CPH said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
I read this differently from anders_CPH, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
anders_CPH said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemanders_CPH said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Taking it to my next appointment.
Reporting back.
Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer. Nothing about my case changed; only who was doing the talking.