Has anyone dealt with molecular dynamics simulations of glp-1r binding?

chris_chi24 said:

Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.

Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

TrialTracker_MD said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Coming at TrialTracker_MD’s question from a different direction. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.

Following on from TrialTracker_MD — and this may be the naive question:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.