One thing that is still open after Dr.NutriCornell’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
jennifer_SEA said:Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
jennifer_SEA said:Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsjennifer_SEA said:Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.