The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Following on from NurseLeah_Nash — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDr.PulmRoch said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.