🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ Fake COAs — March 2026

⚠ Fake COAs — March 2026

Dr.CardioMD Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 8:56 AM 54 replies 3,020 viewsPage 1 of 11
This thread is more than 19 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
Dr.CardioMD
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Cleveland, OH
Oct 31, 2024 at 8:56 AM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

The question I want answered is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

If the honest answer is that nobody knows, that is a useful answer and I would rather have it.

48 18kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FDA_TrackerJim
Senior Member
1,567
7,890
Feb 2024
Rockville, MD
Oct 31, 2024 at 9:19 AM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

47 17Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
Oct 31, 2024 at 9:42 AM#3
FDA_TrackerJim said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Agreeing with FDA_TrackerJim, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

Last edited: Oct 31, 2024 at 12:42 PM
46 16oliver_london, tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
adam_van
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Vancouver, CA
Oct 31, 2024 at 10:05 AM#4
Dr.CardioMD said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

45 15tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul, jim_asheville and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
Oct 31, 2024 at 12:13 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 5 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: Same-day local pickup
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 97.6% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 6 hours
Price: $142/month for semaglutide 2.4mg equivalent

44 14pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo, JakeBK_lifts and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register