🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesGLP-1 and uric acid reduction — my results so far Page 2

GLP-1 and uric acid reduction — my results so far

tampaLisa73 Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 2:00 PM 11 replies 1,054 viewsPage 2 of 3
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Dec 10, 2025 at 5:08 PM#6
Dr.CardioMD said:
Insulin sensitivity test (HOMA-IR) on glycaemic control — arguably the most important metabolic marker most people aren't tracking: HOMA-IR = (fasting…

Complete metabolic panel trending on glycaemic control — sharing because comprehensive data helps everyone:

TestBaselineMonth 3Month 6Month 12
Glucose (fasting)1231019185
Insulin (fasting)1915115
HOMA-IR5.53.41.91.2
Uric Acid8.16.35.84.9

The insulin resistance improvement (HOMA-IR) is what my endo focuses on most. Going from 5.5 to near 1.0 is a metabolic transformation.

1 21VendorMark
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lucas_SP_BR
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
São Paulo, BR
Dec 11, 2025 at 3:57 AM#7
tampaLisa73 said:
Fasting glucose improved within weeks and my HbA1c barely moved for three months, which I now understand and did not at the time.

Patient selection optimization for glycaemic control: emerging predictive biomarkers for GLP-1 agonist response include:

BiomarkerAssociationEvidence Level
Baseline BMIHigher BMI → greater absolute weight lossStrong
Fasting insulinHigher insulin → better responseModerate
GLP1R gene variantsrs6923761 → variable responsePreliminary
Baseline hsCRPHigher CRP → greater CV benefitModerate
Early weight loss (4 wk)≥3% at 4 wks → strong predictor of ≥10% at 68 wksStrong

The 4-week early responder criterion is the most clinically actionable: if you haven't lost ≥3% by week 4 at a therapeutic dose, discuss optimization strategies with your provider.

Last edited: Dec 11, 2025 at 5:57 AM
50 20Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Dec 11, 2025 at 2:47 PM#8
DataDave said:
Complete metabolic panel trending on glycaemic control — sharing because comprehensive data helps everyone: Test Baseline Month 3 Month 6 Month 12…

Fasting insulin is the lab my functional medicine doctor cares about most for glycaemic control: it's a much earlier marker of metabolic dysfunction than glucose or A1C.

My fasting insulin: 30 → 12 → 7 uIU/mL over 9 months. Target is <7. By the time your fasting glucose is elevated, your insulin has been elevated for YEARS trying to compensate.

Ask your doctor to include fasting insulin in your bloodwork panel. It's cheap (~$20) and incredibly informative.

49 19TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
SaraMom3
Member
456
2,345
Aug 2024
Ohio
Dec 12, 2025 at 1:37 AM#9

One thing that is still open after zoe_NC’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

48 18CanadaChris, ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95 and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tampaLisa73
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Tampa, FL
Dec 14, 2025 at 5:37 AM#10
TrialNerd_Beth said:
Fasting insulin is the lab my functional medicine doctor cares about most for glycaemic control: it's a much earlier marker of metabolic dysfunction…

Glycemic variability as the key metric for glycaemic control success: my coefficient of variation (CV) on CGM dropped from 42% to 18%. Target is <36%, with <30% being ideal.

Why this matters more than average glucose: large glucose swings cause oxidative stress, endothelial damage, and promote advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). A flat glucose line at 95 mg/dL is metabolically healthier than oscillating between 60 and 160, even if the average is the same.

16 14TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register