JenMemphis said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
Pushing back on JenMemphis here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
JenMemphis said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
JenMemphis said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
anders_CPH said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.