FDA_TrackerJim said:Denials are usually procedural rather than clinical, and the order that works reflects that.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
FDA_TrackerJim said:Denials are usually procedural rather than clinical, and the order that works reflects that.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Reporting back for the archive rather than for the thread: I did the narrow version of what was suggested, gave it the full interval, and it settled. Posting it because threads without a follow-up are half a thread.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsInsuranceTom said:Reporting back for the archive rather than for the thread: I did the narrow version of what was suggested, gave it the full interval, and it settled.
Second this.
InsuranceTom said:Reporting back for the archive rather than for the thread: I did the narrow version of what was suggested, gave it the full interval, and it settled.
Worth restating a point from upthread for anyone joining at this page:
This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.