hank_denver said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
hank_denver said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
hank_denver said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
anders_CPH said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on anders_CPH here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.