Marketplace rules — vendors must be staff-approved

Coming back to something from earlier in the thread, because it keeps being talked past:

I disagree that testing history is decisive. It tells you what a supplier did when they were being watched. Continuity of behaviour under stress — a late shipment, a failed test, a complaint — is more predictive than any run of good results.

Dr.GutHealth said:

I disagree that testing history is decisive.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.

Dr.GutHealth said:

I disagree that testing history is decisive.

Reprising the part of this that the last few posts have moved away from:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

This was answered several pages up and is worth repeating rather than re-litigating:

For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?