Dr.EM_Chicago said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Coming at Dr.EM_Chicago’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
One concrete data point for the thread. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after Dr.EM_Chicago’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
PeptideChemSF said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.