andrew_nyc said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.
josh_phd_bmore said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
josh_phd_bmore said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Worth separating that from liver and MASH, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.