KevinCompounds said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
KevinCompounds said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
LabKate said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsSleepDoc_PDX said:Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the…
Mine went the same way, slower.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here.