Dr.ObesityMed said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.ObesityMed said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
One thing that is still open after TirzTom’s answer:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDataDave said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part.