PharmacoVig_BOS said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Taking it to my next appointment.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
Dr.SportsMedIN said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.SportsMedIN said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Coming at Dr.SportsMedIN’s question from a different direction. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.