🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionPilates for core strength during GLP-1 weight loss — 12 month update Page 2

Pilates for core strength during GLP-1 weight loss — 12 month update

Dr.NutriCornell Thu, May 2, 2024 at 6:44 PM 12 replies 2,174 viewsPage 2 of 3
mike_nyc
VIP Member
5,678
21,345
Nov 2023
New York
Online
May 3, 2024 at 4:57 AM#6
MikeFit_NJ said:
There is also a quality change that the scan cannot see.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I think this board over-worries about lean mass. Some lean loss is obligatory — you need less muscle to move a smaller body, and preserving mass you no longer need is not a health outcome. The question is whether strength and function held, and mine did.

49 19maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
May 3, 2024 at 8:59 AM#7
Dr.NutriCornell said:
I lifted three times a week throughout and still lost lean mass.

OMG yes. lean mass + resistance training is the combo. Can confirm.

48 18Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.EndoEP
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
El Paso, TX
May 3, 2024 at 1:01 PM#8
mike_nyc said:
I think this board over-worries about lean mass.

Bone density monitoring on lean mass: DEXA bone density at baseline and month 12.

Lumbar spine T-score: -0.8 → -0.6 (stable to slightly improved)
Femoral neck T-score: -0.9 → -0.7 (stable)

No significant bone loss despite 50 lbs of weight loss. Key factors: adequate calcium (1200mg/day), vitamin D (5000 IU/day), resistance training 3x/week, and adequate protein. Weight-bearing exercise is critical for maintaining bone density during rapid weight loss.

Last edited: May 3, 2024 at 3:01 PM
47 17FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
May 3, 2024 at 5:04 PM#9

One thing that is still open after kate.chem’s answer:

What fraction of loss being lean mass is actually normal, because the numbers quoted here range from 10% to 40% and cannot all be right?

46 16sophie_paris, mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
May 4, 2024 at 12:29 PM#10

Reporting back.

Second scan under matched conditions, six months apart, same time of day: the lean number came back nearly a kilo higher than the panic scan. Strength was up throughout.

Last edited: May 4, 2024 at 2:29 PM
50 23pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo, JakeBK_lifts and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register