roxy_nash said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
roxy_nash said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
maria_elpaso said:Weight is a noisy signal — daily variation of one to two kilograms from glycogen, sodium and gut contents — so a fortnight of flat readings is well…
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
roxy_nash said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Carry on.