One thing that is still open after roxy_nash’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
One thing that is still open after roxy_nash’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
kim_atl_prep said:lean mass + resistance training is the combo.
Body composition tracking via bioimpedance on lean mass (InBody scan every 3 months):
| Metric | Baseline | Month 3 | Month 6 | Month 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletal Muscle (lbs) | 75 | 71 | 73 | 73 |
| Body Fat (lbs) | 102 | 83 | 61 | 45 |
| Body Fat % | 41% | 33% | 26% | 20% |
| Visceral Fat (cm²) | 172 | 127 | 92 | 62 |
Note: skeletal muscle mass dipped initially then recovered with consistent resistance training + high protein. The visceral fat reduction is where the metabolic magic happens.
kim_atl_prep said:lean mass + resistance training is the combo.
My endo's protocol for lean mass plateau: if weight loss stalls for 6+ weeks at current dose, we go through this checklist before titrating up:
Only after addressing all of these do we increase the dose. Often fixing one lifestyle factor restarts progress without needing more medication.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardskim_atl_prep said:lean mass + resistance training is the combo.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.