SleepDoc_PDX said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
SleepDoc_PDX said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Coming at SleepDoc_PDX’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
wendy_avl said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I read this differently from wendy_avl, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.