🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMASH / Liver DiseaseHepatic steatosis grading on ultrasound — July 2024 Page 2

Hepatic steatosis grading on ultrasound — July 2024

traveltech_sara Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 11:06 AM 28 replies 1,920 viewsPage 2 of 6
LipidDoc_ATL
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Atlanta, GA
Mar 16, 2025 at 12:13 PM#6
SarahChen_PharmD said:
Liver ultrasound comparison for liver and MASH: my hepatologist ordered serial ultrasounds to track NAFLD regression.

Liver enzyme update related to liver and MASH: I had mildly elevated ALT/AST at baseline (likely NAFLD). After 6 months on GLP-1 therapy:

MarkerBaselineCurrentNormal Range
ALT72247-56 U/L
AST602010-40 U/L
GGT77289-48 U/L
ALP1078444-147 U/L

FibroScan also improved — liver stiffness from 8.5 kPa to 5.2 kPa. The evidence for GLP-1 agonists in NAFLD/NASH is very promising.

45 15rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NicoleRaleigh
Member
356
1,567
Aug 2024
Raleigh, NC
Mar 16, 2025 at 12:39 PM#7
traveltech_sara said:
Fatty liver on an incidental scan two years ago and nobody followed it up.

ATTAIN trial (survodutide) context for liver and MASH: survodutide, a GLP-1/glucagon dual agonist, showed -18.7% body weight at 46 weeks in the Phase 3 ATTAIN trial. NASH resolution was achieved in ~60% of patients[1].

This is relevant to liver and MASH because survodutide's glucagon agonism specifically targets hepatic lipid metabolism — making it potentially the best-in-class agent for NASH/MAFLD comorbid with obesity.

References:
[1] Sanyal AJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2024.
44 14MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
Mar 16, 2025 at 1:05 PM#8
LipidDoc_ATL said:
Liver enzyme update related to liver and MASH: I had mildly elevated ALT/AST at baseline (likely NAFLD).

Coming at LipidDoc_ATL’s question from a different direction. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

Last edited: Mar 16, 2025 at 3:05 PM
43 13tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
anna.melb_AU
Member
678
2,890
Apr 2024
Melbourne, AU
Mar 16, 2025 at 1:31 PM#9

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

42 12tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
traveltech_sara
Member
156
678
Jan 2025
Remote, USA
Mar 16, 2025 at 3:37 PM#10

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence. Two of the three things suggested helped; I cannot separate them and I am not going to pretend otherwise.

24 22BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Survodutide MASH Phase 2b — histological improvement data9 replies
Semaglutide and MASH — liver fat reduction quantification13 replies
Non-invasive MASH biomarkers — FibroScan, ELF, FIB-4 on GLP-110 replies
ALT normalization rates on GLP-1 — pooled trial data20 replies
GLP-1 hepatoprotection — direct vs indirect mechanisms16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register