TrialNerd_Beth said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
PeptideChemSF said:Agreed, and ALT falling is not the same as fibrosis improving.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
TrialNerd_Beth said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
I read this differently from TrialNerd_Beth, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. No action needed from anybody.