PharmD_Rodriguez said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
emily_PDX said:The meal advice is right and incomplete without the hydration point.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.